* Political pressure led to the erosion of responsible lending practices:
In the early 1990s, Fannie and Freddie began to come under considerable political pressure to lower their underwriting standards, particularly on the size of down payments and the credit quality of borrowers. (p.6)
* Lower down payments led to housing prices that outpaced income growth: Once government-sponsored efforts to decrease down payments spread to the wider market, home prices became increasingly untethered from any kind of demand limited by borrowers’ ability to pay. Instead, borrowers could just make smaller down payments and take on higher debt, allowing home prices to continue their unrestrained rise. Some statistics help illustrate how this occurred. Between 2001 and 2006, median home prices increased by an inflation-adjusted 50 percent, yet at the same time Americans’ income failed to keep up. (p. 11)
* Members of an “affordable housing” coalition shared profits with political allies to help legitimize their business practices: Fannie Mae created and used The Fannie Mae Foundation to spread millions of dollars around to politically-connected organizations like the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute. It also hired well-known academics to give an aura of academic rigor to policy positions favorable to Fannie Mae. One paper coauthored by now-Director of the Office of Management and Budget Peter Orszag, concluded that the chance was minimal that the GSEs were not holding sufficient capital to cover their losses in the event of a severe economic shock. The authors suggested that “the risk to the government from a potential default on GSE debt is effectively zero,” and that “the expected cost to the government of providing an explicit government guarantee on $1 trillion in GSE debt is just $2 million.” (p.7)
* The Government Sponsored Enterprises led the way into the housing crisis: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were leaders in risky mortgage lending. According to an analysis presented to the Committee, between 2002 and 2007, Fannie and Freddie purchased $1.9 trillion of mortgages made to borrowers with credit scores below 660, one of the definitions of “subprime” used by federal banking regulators. This represents over 54% of all such mortgages purchased during those years. (p.24)
My comprehensive post on this issue is here. In that post, I collected videos of Democrats admitting that their plan was to force banks to make loans to unqualified borrowers, as well as news articles by the New York Times and Los Angeles Times on the topic.
He wrote that in the New York Review of books, so he was probably thinking no one who disagreed with him would be reading it. But yes - this was a very helpful thing for him to say so we could be clear about it.
I use arguments that focus on identifying pre-suppositions and following the consequences. My apologetics skills were formed by E. J. Carnell and Francis Schaeffer!
Mmm Mmm Mmm here you go Timmah http://www.glennbeck.com/content/videos/?uri=channels/338017/574719 It's only got a clip of that, and you have to sit through a commercial, but it's there.
"This is very much worth watching, especially for atheists who typically are not aware that evolution rests on a philsophical assumption that is assumed, and that contradicts astrophysics." Also known as presuppositions. Despite your declaration of not liking presuppositional apologetics, sometimes your other comments make me think you're a pr […]
On an atheistic worldview, humans would also be matter. Not only is there no moral standard to say that murder is objectively wrong on atheism, but there no personal responsibility either - your genes made you do it. And in any case, as you noted, it's just scattering atoms. As long as you can escape detection and punishment from the arbitrary rules of […]
"The fact that we have minds is an obvious counterexample." Not really. If there is no God, our minds, whether viewed as material or immaterial, are undesigned and unintended. They, and the person who possesses them, have no more value or worth or purpose, ultimately, than the dead stardust from which they accidently emerged. They are nothing more […]
07/08/2009 • 2:00 AM
Who caused the recession? How did the housing bubble happen?
Republicans on the House Oversight have released a report that explains what caused the subprime crisis.
I can’t read the whole thing! But Hot Air has the key facts so you don’t have to read it either!
My comprehensive post on this issue is here. In that post, I collected videos of Democrats admitting that their plan was to force banks to make loans to unqualified borrowers, as well as news articles by the New York Times and Los Angeles Times on the topic.
Filed under: Commentary , ACORN, Bank, Banking, Bernanke, Community Reinvestment Act, Crisis, Dodd, Economics, Fannie Mae, Fed, Frank, Freddie Mac, Gorelick, Government, GSE, Interest Rates, Johnson, Lending, Mortgage, Mortgage Securitization, Obama, Pritzker, Raines, Recession, Responsible, Socialism, Subprime, Subprime Crisis, Subprime Loans, Warned, Warning, Who Caused