I found these three videos on Apologetics 315. They are each about 5 minutes long.
Here’s the first one:
Part 1 of a trilogy. Greg lays out a classic argument that God does not exist, called ‘The Problem of Evil’. He distinguishes two versions of that argument, which are sometimes called ‘the deductive’ and ‘the evidential’ version. He goes into some details on the deductive version.
And the second one:
Part 2 of a trilogy. Here, Greg gives a response to the deductive version of the Problem of Evil on behalf of someone who believes that God exists. In thinking about this response, we need to think about whether God can make contradictions true, and whether God can have good reasons for allowing bad things to happen.
And the third one:
Part 3 of a trilogy. Greg considers the evidential version of the Problem of Evil, and gives a response on behalf of someone who believes that God exists. This involves considering whether God might have a good reason to allow bad things to happen.
Recently, I was chastised by a suitor to one of my former proteges for not teaching her about what the word “theodicy” means, so I’m just going to fix that right now. Theodicy is “the branch of theology concerned with defending the attributes of God against objections resulting from physical and moral evil”.
See the links below for more.
- Why would a good God allow people to suffer?
- William Lane Craig lectures on the evidential problem of evil
- William Lane Craig lectures on the logical problem of evil
- If God has a reason for allowing evil and suffering, should we know what it is?
- Why does God allow his creatures to suffer?
- Frank Turek: can God bring good effects out of evil events?