Canada is hostile to free speech, as shown in the recent Supreme Court decision.
Canada’s top court has released a unanimous decision today that critics say has struck a monumental blow against freedom of speech, opinion, and religion across the country. The court ordered the defendant, a Christian pro-family activist with a reputation for intense activism, not only to pay a fine, but also to pay court costs which could amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars.
[…]In Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v. Whatcott, the Supreme Court decided that born-again Christian William Whatcott was guilty of hate speech for distributing flyers to neighborhoods in Saskatoon and Regina in 2001 and 2002. While the flyers used vehement language against homosexual practices and the homosexual agenda, they did not directly attack homosexual persons.
[…]The Court focused on Whatcott’s main argument, namely that he loves homosexuals with a brotherly Christian love, and it is only their sexual activity that he denounces.
But the Supreme Court found that with regards to hate speech, the distinction between ‘sin and sinner’ no longer applies.
“I agree that sexual orientation and sexual behaviour can be differentiated for certain purposes,” the Court stated. “However, in instances where hate speech is directed toward behaviour in an effort to mask the true target, the vulnerable group, this distinction should not serve to avoid s. 14(1)(b) [the hate-crime clause of the Code].”
“Courts have recognized a strong connection between sexual orientation and sexual conduct and where the conduct targeted by speech is a crucial aspect of the identity of a vulnerable group, attacks on this conduct stand as proxy for attacks on the group itself,” the Court stated.
The Court ordered Whatcott to pay the Human Rights Commission’s legal fees and to pay $7,500 in compensation to two homosexuals who were offended by his flyers.
Gwen Landolt, national vice-president of REAL Women of Canada, called the ruling “very depressing” and “bad news”.
[…]“On the one hand they’re saying, ‘Oh, no, no, no, we’re not really infringing on freedom of religion and freedom of speech and freedom of opinion’, but in fact, what they say is not what they’ve done,” she said in an interview with LifeSiteNews.com.
Next time we have an election, can we vote in favor of free speech? I don’t agree with anything Whatcott did – form or content. The man is a fool. But I can easily see how this ruling could be used to silence reasonable speech that disagrees with homosexuality and gay marriage on secular grounds. The motivation of these judges is to silence speech critical of the gay agenda, and we should all be concerned about that. They pick these kooks like Whatcott to attack because they won’t get any opposition from normal people. But later you’ll find out that these legal precedents will furnish the foundation for eliminating free speech altogether. It’s happened before.
Apparently, there is some effort to repeal section 13 in Canada, which is the part that criminalizes speech deemed offensive by the political left. That might affect future rulings of the Supreme Court if it is made clear that the right to free speech is absolute.
- Free speech under attack from the secular left in the UK and Canada
- By repealing section 13, Canada takes a baby step toward freedom of speech
- Free speech hero Mark Steyn reflects on the demise of Section 13 fascism
- Canadian conservatives pass bill to repeal Section 13 speech code
- Youtube reverses decision to ban video critical of gay activism in Canada
- Alberta judge rules that it is legal to disagree with homosexuality
- Conservative MP’s bill to repeal Section 13 moves to committee
- Conservative MP introduces bill to abolish Section 13 speech code
- Ezra Levant on the new Sun News television network
- What happens when same-sex marriage conflicts with religious liberty?
- Human Rights Tribunal finds Catholic school board guilty of discrimination
- Saskatchewan planning to abolish its Human Rights Tribunal
- In Canada, Blazing Cat Fur is being sued for linking to Mark Steyn
- Canadian Human Rights Commissions continue war on Christians
- Video of Ezra Levant and Mark Steyn testifying against Canadian HRCs
- The Conservative Party takes up free speech in British Columbia
- The Conservative Party takes up free speech in Ontario
- Video of Ezra Levant discussing free speech on the Michael Coren show
- Video interview with Ezra Levant by the libertarian Fraser Institute