On Tuesday, the nation made history. It made history in electing the first African American president; it made history in building a bigger margin for the first female Speaker of the House; it made history in delivering the biggest Democratic margin since 1964; it made history in sending a record number of people to the polls and the highest percentage turnout since the 1960 election.
[...]But one thing is immediately clear. Unmarried women played a pivotal role in making this history and in changing this nation. They delivered a stunning 70 to 29 percent margin to Barack Obama and delivered similarly strong margins in races for Congress and the U.S. Senate. Although unmarried women have voted Democratic consistently since marital status has been was tracked, this election represents the highest margin recorded and a 16-point net gain at the Presidential level from 2004.
In particular, note the chart that shows that younger unmarried women voted 77-22 for Obama. 77-22 for Obama. This is actually in keeping with my previous post on this topic, which documented how women have continuously voted for bigger and bigger government since they started voting. The problem with big government policies is that they drain money from the family which is then redistributed outside of the family.
To have a strong family, you need more than just money. You need independence so that you can keep your vision distinct and separate from the vision of the government. If a family depends on the government, then they are beholden to the government’s values. The government can even overrule conscience rights and religious liberty. Keeping the family strong and separate from government is especially important for Christian parents who have a specific goal of passing on their faith to their children.
Here are just a few of the things I thought of that help make a marriage strong: (there are many more)
- low taxes so the household has more money to spend on the things we need for our plan
- access to low cost energy provided by domestic energy production by private firms
- access to low cost, high quality consumer goods through increased free trade
- the ability to choose homeschooling or private schools (and the more school choice, the better)
- the ability to fund a retirement plan that covers the family – not anyone else
- the ability to purchase a health care plan that covers the family – not anyone else
- the ability to own firearms for protection of the home and the family
- the ability to pass Christian convictions on to children without interference from the state
- the ability to speak and act as a Christian in public without reprisals from secular left special interest groups
- low threat of being the victim of criminal activity
- low threat of being bankrupted by the costs of divorce court
- low threat of being arrested on a false domestic violence charge (e.g. – verbal abuse)
- low threat of never seeing your children because of loss of custody after a divorce
- low threat of being imprisoned due to failure to pay alimony and child support after a job loss
It seems to me that a vote for Obama is a vote against all of these things. So then why did unmarried women (especially Christian women) vote for him? It seems as thought they are less interested in marriage and family and more interested in having the government provide incentives for anti-child, anti-family behaviors like pre-marital sex, contraceptives, abortions, welfare for single mothers, divorce courts, government coercion of husbands, state-run day-care, government-run schools, in-vitro fertilization, etc. I don’t mind if people need these things, but they should pay for it themselves. but I don’t see why unmarried women should favor family money being spent on government programs that help other people to avoid the cost and consequences of their own decisions.