Is the Bible’s definition of faith opposed to logic and evidence?

Probably the biggest misconception that I encounter when defending the faith is the mistaken notion of what faith is. Today we are going to get to the bottom of what the Bible says faith is, once and for all. This post will be useful to Christians and atheists, alike.

What is faith according to the Bible?

I am going to reference this article from apologist Greg Koukl of Stand to Reason in my explanation.

Koukl cites three Biblical examples to support the idea that faith is not blind leap-of-faith wishing, but is based on evidence.

  1. Moses went out into the wilderness and he had that first encounter with the burning bush, and God gave him the directive to go back to Egypt and let his people go. Moses said, Yeah, right. What’s going to happen when they say, why should we believe you, Moses?God said, See that staff? Throw it down.Moses threw it down and it turned into a serpent.God said, See that serpent? Pick it up.And he picked it up and it turned back into a staff.God said, Now you take that and do that before the Jewish people and you do that before Pharaoh. And you do this number with the hail, and the frogs, and turning the Nile River into blood. You put the sun out. You do a bunch of other tricks to get their attention.And then comes this phrase: “So that they might know that there is a God in Israel.”
  2. [I]n Mark 2 you see Jesus preaching in a house, and you know the story where they take the roof off and let the paralytic down through the roof. Jesus said, “Your sins are forgiven.” And people get bugged because how can anyone forgive sins but God alone?Jesus understood what they were thinking and He said this: What’s harder to say, your sins are forgiven, or to rise, take up your pallet and go home?Now, I’ll tell you what would be harder for me to say : Arise, take up your pallet and go home. I can walk into any Bible study and say your sins are forgiven and nobody is going to know if I know what I am talking about or not. But if I lay hands on somebody in a wheelchair and I say, Take up your wheelchair and go home, and they sit there, I look pretty dumb because everyone knows nothing happened.But Jesus adds this. He says, “In order that you may know that the Son of Man has the power and authority to forgive sins, I say to you, arise, take up your pallet and go home.” And he got up and he got out. Notice the phrase “In order that you may know”. Same message, right?
  3. Move over to the Book of Acts. First sermon after Pentecost. Peter was up in front of this massive crowd. He was talking about the resurrection to which he was an eyewitness. He talked about fulfilled prophecy. He talked about the miraculous tongues and the miraculous manifestation of being able to speak in a language you don’t know. Do you think this is physical evidence to those people? I think so. Pretty powerful.Peter tells them, These men are not drunk as it seems, but rather this is a fulfillment of prophecy. David spoke of this. Jesus got out of the grave, and we saw him, and we proclaim this to you.Do you know how he ends his sermon? It’s really great. Acts 2:36. I’ve been a Christian 20 years and I didn’t see this until about a year ago. This is for all of those who think that if you can know it for sure, you can’t exercise faith in it. Here is what Peter said. Acts 2:36, “Therefore let all the house of Israel know for certain that God has made him both Lord and Christ, Messiah, this Jesus whom you crucified.” There it is again. “Know for certain.”

What is faith according to Bible-based theologians?

I am going to reference this article from theologian C. Michael Patton of Parchment and Pen in my explanation.

Patton explains that according to Reformation (conservative, Bible-based) theologians, faith has 3 parts:

  1. notitia – This is the basic informational foundation of our faith. It is best expressed by the word content. Faith, according to the Reformers must have content. You cannot have faith in nothing. There must be some referential propositional truth to which the faith points. The proposition “Christ rose from the grave,” for example, is a necessary information base that Christians must have.
  2. assensus – This is the assent or confidence that we have that the notitia is correct… This involves evidence which leads to the conviction of the truthfulness of the proposition… This involves intellectual assent and persuasion based upon critical thought… assensus… says, “I am persuaded to believe that Christ rose from the grave.”
  3. fiducia – This is the “resting” in the information based upon a conviction of its truthfulness. Fiducia is best expressed by the English word “trust.”… Fiducia is the personal subjective act of the will to take the final step. It is important to note that while fiducia goes beyond or transcends the intellect, it is built upon its foundation.

So, Biblical faith is really trust. Trust(3) can only occur after intellectual assent(2), based on evidence and thought. Intellectual assent(2) can only occur after the propositional information(1) is known.

The church today accepts 1 and 3, but denies 2. I call this “fideism” or “blind faith”. Ironically, activist atheists, (the New Atheists), also believe that faith is blind. The postmodern “emergent church” denies 1 and 2. A person could accept 1 and 2 but deny 3 by not re-prioritizing their life based on what they know to be true.

How do beliefs form, according to Christian philosophers?

I am going to reference a portion of chapter 3 of J.P. Moreland’s “Love Your God With All Your Mind” (i.e. – LYGWYM).

J.P. Moreland explains how beliefs form and how you can change them.

  1. Today, people are inclined to think that the sincerity and fervency of one’s beliefs are more important than the content… Nothing could be further from the truth… As far as reality is concerned, what matters is not whether I like a belief or how sincere I am in believing it but whether or not the belief is true. I am responsible for what I believe and, I might add, for what I refuse to believe because the content of what I do or do not believe makes a tremendous difference to what I become and how I act.
  2. A belief’s strength is the degree to which you are convinced the belief is true. As you gain ,evidence and support for a belief, its strength grows for you… The more certain you are of a belief… the more you rely on it as a basis for action.

But the most important point of the article is that your beliefs are not under the control of your will.

…Scripture holds us responsible for our beliefs since it commands us to embrace certain beliefs and warns us of the consequences of accepting other beliefs. On the other hand, experience teaches us that we cannot choose or change our beliefs by direct effort.

For example, if someone offered you $10,000 to believe right now that a pink elephant was sitting next to you, you could not really choose to believe this… If I want to change my beliefs about something, I can embark on a course of study in which I choose to think regularly about certain things, read certain pieces of evidence and argument, and try to find problems with evidence raised against the belief in question.

…by choosing to undertake a course of study… I can put myself in a position to undergo a change in… my beliefs… And… my character and behavior… will be transformed by these belief changes.

The article goes on to make some very informative comments on the relationship between apologetics and belief.

10 thoughts on “Is the Bible’s definition of faith opposed to logic and evidence?”

  1. Thank you for posting this, WK. I am becoming increasingly frustrated with Christians who misunderstand and misrepresent biblical faith. For example, a friend on facebook has been commenting on atheist pages and saying things like, “stop using your logic and intellect and start using faith!” I cringe…

    Like

    1. When you run a blog, you hear this stuff every day from e-mails and comments. I got an e-mail today from someone teaching an apologetics Bible study who has to put up with people who oppose science and evidence and just want to decide everything by feelings.

      Like

  2. I can imagine. I find myself arguing with anti-intellectual Christians almost as much as atheists. It is a daunting task talking to people who think logic, reason, science, and evidence are of the Devil. It’s hard to even know where to begin. For example, on a Christian discussion board, I recently brought up the challenge, “Can God create a rock so heavy he can’t lift it?” and this was one guy’s response: “That my friend is a retarded question presented by Satan through atheistic mentality to confuse Christians and foster confusion with the intent to make one rationalize Truth!”

    He clarified that “Truth” with a capital “T” refers to the Bible. So, apparently we shouldn’t use rationality when we read the Bible…Hmm…

    Eventually, I give up on trying to reason with them and just urge them to read “Love Your God with All Your Mind,” but I’m sure this is to no avail. They would much rather read a self-help book or “Spiritual Warfare: How to Defeat the Demons” (I made this up, but heck, it could be a real book). The bottom line is that this extreme anti-intellectualism in the church is a huge problem that we face as Christian ambassadors. I’d be interested in your thoughts on the matter.

    Like

    1. LOL! Well, they read Frank Peretti and Left Behind, so yeah, that could be a real book.

      Honestly? I think that if Christians knew why they believe what they say the believe, and applied it to public issues like marriage and politics and economics, we could really make a huge impact on the world for Christ.

      Like

  3. Absolutely. Sadly, most Christians lack a robust Christian worldview. This is due in large part to the failings of the church, in my opinion. I want to share with you a few of my, perhaps farfetched, proposals: 1.) Every church has at least one apologist on staff who teaches classes and speaks regularly on apologetics and current social issues from a Christian worldview. 2.) Christian channels like TBN are replaced by channels dedicated to topics relevant to the defense of the faith, featuring lectures, debates, and interviews with the best Christian philosophers and theologians. 3.) Rather than Joel Osteen, Rick Warren, and John MacArthur, we rally to get Christian thinkers like J.P. Moreland, William Lane Craig, and Alvin Plantinga interviewed on CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News to represent the Christian side.

    What do you think about my dream world, WK? Any other ideas?

    Like

    1. I’d like to see Christians get serious about fiscal policy (Jay Richards), social policy (Jennifer Roback Morse) and foreign policy, too. If we could all talk about taxes and free trade and marriage and abortion the way we can talk about the kalam argument and the minimal facts case for the resurrection, that would be great.

      Like

  4. This is an absolutely brilliant post, WK, surely one of your best.

    If I hear another Christian say “You don’t need evidence, that’s why it’s called faith”, I will probably punch them!

    Like

  5. I have a question, where does Hebrews 11, “Faith is the substance of things unseen/hoped for” come in?

    Like

    1. It means that faith is the acting consistently on the beliefs you hope for. Now that hope is supported by reason and evidence, because of 1 Pet 3:15, which says that you have to be ready to give a reasoned defense for those things you hope for. The Biblical definition of faith is trust based on evidence.

      Like

    2. The Bible does not contrast faith with reason. It contrasts faith with sight. Once the object of your faith arrives, you no longer have faith because you have sight. Hebrews 11 shows this well. It speaks of faith in what is unseen, not that which is counter to reason and evidence.
      Hope is another word that means something different in the Bible than it does in popular culture. Biblical hope is looking forward to what you know is coming. It’s not wishful thinking. So, again, faith (substance of things hoped for) refers to things you know, through reason, to be true.

      Like

Leave a comment