What’s behind the explosion of sexual activity among college students?

Consider this article about the problem first, from the Wall Street Journal.

Excerpt:

The two most serious ethical challenges college students face are binge drinking and the culture of hooking up.

Alcohol-related accidents are the leading cause of death for young adults aged 17-24. Students who engage in binge drinking (about two in five) are 25 times more likely to do things like miss class, fall behind in school work, engage in unplanned sexual activity, and get in trouble with the law. They also cause trouble for other students, who are subjected to physical and sexual assault, suffer property damage and interrupted sleep, and end up babysitting problem drinkers.

Hooking up is getting to be as common as drinking. Sociologist W. Bradford Wilcox, who heads the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia, says that in various studies, 40%-64% of college students report doing it.

The effects are not all fun. Rates of depression reach 20% for young women who have had two or more sexual partners in the last year, almost double the rate for women who have had none. Sexually active young men do more poorly than abstainers in their academic work. And as we have always admonished our own children, sex on these terms is destructive of love and marriage.

Here is one simple step colleges can take to reduce both binge drinking and hooking up: Go back to single-sex residences.

I know it’s countercultural. More than 90% of college housing is now co-ed. But Christopher Kaczor at Loyola Marymount points to a surprising number of studies showing that students in co-ed dorms (41.5%) report weekly binge drinking more than twice as often as students in single-sex housing (17.6%). Similarly, students in co-ed housing are more likely (55.7%) than students in single-sex dorms (36.8%) to have had a sexual partner in the last year—and more than twice as likely to have had three or more.

Now this is where things get interesting. The religious conservative people don’t like students drinking, hooking up, and getting depressed. Who could possibly be in favor of hurting women?

Well, consider this article in the College Fix.

Excerpt:

Now John Banzhaf, a law professor at George Washington University, is suing CUA for discrimination.

Banzhaf filed a complaint with the Washington D.C. Human Rights Office alleging that the university had violated D.C.’s Human Rights Act. CUA lawyers met with Banzhaf at the Human Rights Office on September 15 to defend the university’s decision.

Banzhaf, who has a history of using lawsuits to fight against what he sees as discrimination, compared the university’s decision to separate students by sex to separating them by religion or race.  He specifically linked the single-sex dorm policy to the “separate but equal” racial policy in place in the U.S. before civil rights movement.

He also told CUA’s student newspaper, The Tower, that the decision is “the same as saying that since Muslims and Jews don’t get along we should force them to live apart.”

What’s behind the push to make women drink and hook-up with men? Feminism.

What feminism says, in practice, is that men have no special duties when compared to women. To say that men have anything special that they are responsible for is to be “sexist”. Therefore, men and women have to be lumped together from kindergarten to college graduation so that they can be identical in every way. Anything less would be “discrimination”.

Related posts

8 thoughts on “What’s behind the explosion of sexual activity among college students?”

  1. Thanks SO much for the link!

    And dittos to the feminism being the problem… hopefully CUA’s decision to switch back to single-sex dorms will be part of the solution.

    Like

  2. What’s behind the explosion of sexual activity among college students?

    Very good question, WK, and it’s certainly worth thinking about. I would have to say that while feminism certainly has it’s faults, it has been around for a while now. It appears to me that the problem is sexual exploitation from both sides (men and women).

    I remember some statistics quite a while back that showed women being subjected to more sexuality on television than men. Even though I was a teenager at the time, I was genuinely disturbed by this data. I wondered what the affects would be. Focus on the Family pointed out some time ago that as cable television (or at least the equivelant) has spread across the globe, eating disorders have increased, so we know that it hasn’t all been to the glory of feminism. Now, with the dawn of the internet and cell phones, we are experiencing a sexual revolution of cataclysmic proportions.

    With the combination of the break down of marriage (in and out of the church), the extraordinary facilitation of the sexual revolution through the media, the normalization of and the legitimization of free sex/free love, the soft-peddled gospel of all too many churches, the lack of spiritual guidance and discipline to prepare for independance, and even the compromises of decent, well meaning, Christian parents, all have contributed to the moral tsunami, the yeilding to the baser, natural proclivities of our fallen nature. It is all too easy to float downstream. Too many kids have no reason to deny themselves the pleasures that are so easily at hand. And why not, when all they’ve seen of marriage is nothing but problems and turmoil? this is the age of narcissism, when the only sin is for pleasure and instant gratification to be denied.

    Like

  3. I actually benefited greatly from coed dorms in that I met my wife in college when we were assigned to dorm rooms across the hall from each other. My wife and a few of my other female friends did spend a summer in the all-female dorm and preferred the coed dorm (the all-female dorm was too catty). And I was originally assigned to an all-male section of a coed dorm, which was the most disgusting and torn-apart section of the entire dorm.

    That said, coed dorms can only encourage the “hooking up” culture and are in general a bad idea. My wife and I did well in a coed dorm because we’re good students and didn’t “hook up” with people (we didn’t get drunk, either). When in general students hook up with each other, then in general coed dorms are a bad idea.

    Single sex dorms would reduce hooking up by making it less convenient (especially if members of the opposite sex are restricted from entering the dorm), but ultimately the hook up culture itself needs to be destroyed.

    As for Banzhaf, he commits the same mistake as those who equate same-sex marriage with interracial marriage: while race has no inherent effect on this issue, gender does. I suppose Banzhaf opposes single-sex bathrooms on the basis of “discrimination” too, but in case he hasn’t thought of that let’s not mention it to him.

    Like

  4. In my own personal experience, the co-ed dorms were less targeted for criminal behavior –peeping tom’s, lurkers and gropers– than the all female dorms. I certainly felt much safer going to sleep, or walking into the bathroom at night, knowing that I wasn’t in a building populated entirely with 18-22 year old women.

    Like

Leave a comment