New study: Saturn’s orbit keeps Earth in the circumstellar habitable zone

Circumstellar Habitable Zone
Circumstellar Habitable Zone

What do you need in order to have a planet that supports complex life? First, you need liquid water at the surface of the planet. But there is only a narrow range of temperatures that can support liquid water. It turns out that the size of the star that your planet orbits around has a lot to do with whether you get liquid water or not.

A heavy, metal-rich star allows you to have a habitable planet far enough from the star so  the planet can support liquid water on the planet’s surface while still being able to spin on its axis. The zone where a planet can have liquid water at the surface is called the circumstellar habitable zone (CHZ). A metal-rich star like our Sun is very massive, which moves the habitable zone out further away from the star.

If our star were smaller, we would have to orbit much closer to the star in order to have liquid water at the surface. Unfortunately, if you go too close to the star, then your planet becomes tidally locked, like the moon is tidally locked to Earth. Tidally locked planets are inhospitable to life. So we need a star massive enough to give us a nice wide habitable zone far away from the Sun itself.

But even with the right size star, which we have in our solar sytem, we still have CHZ problems. Just because a planet starts off in the circumstellar habitable zone, it doesn’t mean that it will stay there.

Jay Richards tweeted about this new article from the New Scientist, which talks about that very problem.

Excerpt: (links removed)

Earth’s comfortable temperatures may be thanks to Saturn’s good behaviour. If the ringed giant’s orbit had been slightly different, Earth’s orbit could have been wildly elongated, like that of a long-period comet.

Our solar system is a tidy sort of place: planetary orbits here tend to be circular and lie in the same plane, unlike the highly eccentric orbits of many exoplanets. Elke Pilat-Lohinger of the University of Vienna, Austria, was interested in the idea that the combined influence of Jupiter and Saturn – the solar system’s heavyweights – could have shaped other planets’ orbits. She used computer models to study how changing the orbits of these two giant planets might affect the Earth.

Earth’s orbit is so nearly circular that its distance from the sun only varies between 147 and 152 million kilometres, or around 2 per cent about the average. Moving Saturn’s orbit just 10 percent closer in would disrupt that by creating a resonance – essentially a periodic tug – that would stretch out the Earth’s orbit by tens of millions of kilometres. That would result in the Earth spending part of each year outside the habitable zone, the ring around the sun where temperatures are right for liquid water.

Tilting Saturn’s orbit would also stretch out Earth’s orbit. According to a simple model that did not include other inner planets, the greater the tilt, the more the elongation increased. Adding Venus and Mars to the model stabilised the orbits of all three planets, but the elongation nonetheless rose as Saturn’s orbit got more tilted. Pilat-Lohinger says a 20-degree tilt would bring the innermost part of Earth’s orbit closer to the sun than Venus.

So the evidence for a out solar system being fine-tuned for life keeps piling up. It’s just another factor that has to be just right so that complex, embodied life could exist here. All of these factors need to be just right, not just the orbits of any other massive planets. And you need at least one massive planet to attract comets and other such unwelcome intruders away from the life-permitting planets.

Here’s a good clip explaining the circumstellar habitable zone:

The factor I blogged about today is just one of the things you need in order to get a planet that supports life.

Here are a few of the more well-known ones:

  • a solar system with a single massive Sun than can serve as a long-lived, stable source of energy
  • a terrestrial planet (non-gaseous)
  • the planet must be the right distance from the sun in order to preserve liquid water at the surface – if it’s too close, the water is burnt off in a runaway greenhouse effect, if it’s too far, the water is permanently frozen in a runaway glaciation
  • the solar system must be placed at the right place in the galaxy – not too near dangerous radiation, but close enough to other stars to be able to absorb heavy elements after neighboring stars die
  • a moon of sufficient mass to stabilize the tilt of the planet’s rotation
  • plate tectonics
  • an oxygen-rich atmosphere
  • a sweeper planet to deflect comets, etc.
  • planetary neighbors must have non-eccentric orbits

Here is a study that I wrote about recently about galactic habitable zones.

9 thoughts on “New study: Saturn’s orbit keeps Earth in the circumstellar habitable zone”

  1. It would appear that our solar system was intricately designed to support life on Earth. And to declare the glory of God. (Psalm 19:1-4)

    Like

  2. @WorldGoneCrazy

    Could you enlightenment me as to why the universe is entirely hostile to life as far as we can observe in terms of being uninhabitable except for this little blue planet called earth.

    Like

    1. Yes, Sir: see my original posting. Those are 2 reasons. Glad to hear that you are not falling for the old “search for ET.” God bless you, Sir!

      Like

        1. Wow – great question, infowarrior1! I don’t know the answer to that one at all. I remember spending a bit of study on terra-forming, back in my working days. (I did a lot of spacecraft design, including a mission to mars effort.) I just think that is a super-duper question! What do you think, infowarrior1, from your perspective?

          I think that visiting other planets, generally with unmanned spacecraft, but also possibly with human beings, is absolutely a great thing – under the Christian worldview. Colonization takes that at least one step further. Just as telescopes are awesome, and any scientific investigations that do not intentionally destroy human life, for that matter. That seems to fit well with general revelation under Christianity. Does anyone else want to enlighten me too – from either side of this, Christian or a-theist?

          Like

          1. The only problem is come judgment day. Revelation references only planet earth as where the resurrection occurs before the great white throne judgment.

            Like

          2. So, if a Christian happened to be on a mission on the surface of the Earth’s moon when Judgment Day came, what are you saying would happen to him? Would he be Left Behind in a lunar purgatory? :-) (I’m thinking of the Apollo missions here. What if Judgment Day had happened then. Or, how about if it had occurred when Borman, Lovell, and Anders were reading Genesis while orbiting the Moon on Apollo 8?)

            Like

Leave a comment